M41
Mmf and bi males
May 13 2018
Comments
-
RHP User
8 years ago
M2M just looks so wrong as Mrs Fresh one said. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
AnnieWhichway
8 years ago
A true bi person, male or female, is able to have a full coupled relationship with either sex. Most people who use the bi label is not emotionally able to have a coupled relationship with same sex. So if you use a scale from 0 to 10, 0 is strictly hetero interaction, 10 being homo interaction(gay). A true bi would be 5. So 1, 2, 3 and 4 would happily engage in same sex interaction in various levels. These may be labelled experimental, hetero flexible, bi curious etc. Those that fall in at 6, 7, 8 and 9 would be only up for homo relationship but happily play with opposite sex in certain situations. Labels are restrictive but can be helpful in explaining a person's perceived sexuality. Me, I'm a 4. Not interested in a homo relationship......unless said male was very financially secure and able to address my shoe, bag and clothing wardrobe.....then l would be a 5. Well ......4.99
-
RHP User
8 years ago
1. -> they're using the wrong terms then. MFM is different to MMF bi. Perhaps they just didn't hang out on Craiglist long enough to learn their acronyms. Based on my experiences with bi men, women with my specific preferences for watching 2 guys or having proper 3 ways are the exception not the rule. 2. -> as already mentioned there are degrees. Most couples here will be heteroromantic bisexuals at a guess. 4. -> not neccesarily, some guys can stay hard though anything, even things that don't turn them on at all. They are still partaking in a bisexual act though, technically 6. -> our culture, basically. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
8 years ago
Damn I need to upgrade and message you ;) - Posted from rhpmobile
-
nightingale8
8 years ago
Everyone has their own take. I don't think it matters really. In most cases, these categories are only useful if you have a vested interest in segregating people. In research, they often refer to them as "men who have sex with men". Simple. No ambiguity. (Unless you subscribe to the old "it's not sex if...." game!) A personal peeve of mine in the swinging world is the expectation that the women who, bi or not, are expected to play together first as if it's some sort of performance. It's a sort of societal conditioning, which is fine if exhibitionism is your thing but I think runs anti to the fact that women's pleasure is not a performance. It's very much the 'real thing'. I would happily watch MM action or partake in an MMF. I love men, why would I stop at one or restrict the activities? - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
8 years ago
My husband is bi, and I get very turned on by mmf play, and participating in it. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
nightingale8
8 years ago
I realise I haven't answered the question directly - women aren't conditioned to objectify men. They especially aren't encouraged to enjoy watching men for their own pleasure. It's not part of the societal script. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
8 years ago
With men I'm familiar with. Not sure it will ever happen though. I think more men need to be more open with themselves and admit that they are at least curious about it. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
8 years ago
5. Ladyboy aka shemale etc, may have a male genitalia but the action (if pegging) could be effectively be the same as pegging with a normal female and toy. If you are attracted to the woman as viewed as a woman (the other 99% of her), I can't see how that could be anything but straight in this case. Likewise a 100% straight man can still enjoy anal play on his own as part of masturbation or from a female, if he is not at all attracted to actual men. Everyone has an anus and whether it is the focus of any pleasure is irrelevant to who you are or are not attracted to. Like in all the scenarios, your bi nature is whether you are attracted to the person, not necessarily anything to do with the activity. Of course in certain circumstances an otherwise straight person may experiment. Someone mentioned prison. But is that really a change in underlying attraction? Or just an outlet for strong hormonal driven needs? Likewise a man might experiment with another man in presence of and with encouragement from a woman (perhaps his partner), but never consider meeting even the same man or another man separately/in private. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
8 years ago
Ive read all the questions. All I have to say is if you are enjoying each experience and its not impacting on anyone else, why worry about how others would perceive it? I have had bi FWBs and I find watching MM play a huge turn on. It still surprises me that bi females are accepted by most people yet bi men are not so.
-
Haleakala
8 years ago
People seem to obsess about the labels. Start adding labels for the kinks you're into as well as sexuality , top/dom/switch/sadist/fetishist/daddy/little etc, it all ends up mind-boggling. Labels may go us describe what we like but expecting that definition to be precise and unambiguous is fraught with danger. Don't stress the labels, just enjoy the experiences. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
technologic
8 years ago
Any kind of MM play is a turn on for me whether they're gay, bi or flexible. The more cocks the better! 😍 MR is heteroflexible and I love that about him. I guess for the sake of communicating what kind of play one could expect from someone, the term MMF(bi) probably just means the person is open to sexual interaction between the two men as well. Combined with the description under 'orientation' you'll get a better understanding if the person is also actually bi/gay/lesbian. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
8 years ago
Where are all the couples that want to try this? - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
8 years ago
But, as others here have commented, you are trying to get a little too scientific with the simple joys of jiggy-jig OP. Whatever cranks your motor, as long as you are not hurting anybody and everybody's a grown adult do whatever you want with whomever you want and don't worry too much about labelling things. I say too much because us humans generally like to distinguish ourselves from others and vice-versa, there is nothing wrong with labelling people provided it is not done in a harmful way. Tying yourself up in knots though about whether doing this, that or the other whilst standing on tippy-toe and does this make me bi or bi-curious will just result in you getting all flustered. I'm a bi male that prefers sex with women, have only met one or two men that I think I could possibly enter into a relationship with, like bi MMF threesomes (or is that mFm? mmF? Fmm? See what I mean by confusing?) but also straight MMF threesomes. I do whatever I want, and whatever the person/s I am having fun with wants, and leave all the navel-gazing to others. At the end of the day, I don't give a rats about all the other stuff, I'm a bi male. Have fun whatever you decide, don't spend too much time dwelling on the minutiae.
-
RHP User
8 years ago
My wife loved it, with the right bloke I would swap with her and become the meat in the sandwich. Lol.
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 15123 Comments: 88145
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1417 Comments: 10231
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2520 Comments: 11665
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2506 Comments: 9760
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 1007 Comments: 5253
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1303 Comments: 5776
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 782 Comments: 1988
-
LGBT
Topics: 170 Comments: 867
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets

reply
like
Share