RHP

RHP User

M61

Fair play.

May 01 2016

I was puzzled to why some here don't interact when you converse with them. ? But then I received a message from a couple explaining certain members interact on another medium and decide who is the right flavour and who is not. If true, is this not a type of vilification ? Personally , I think this type of behaviour is unacceptable and should be frowned upon by RHP. The forums are for everyone and everyone deserves to be a part of all topics.. I trust this post is accepted for what it is and not treated like this behaviour does not exist.

Comments

Page 2 of 2 1 2

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    You should know 😯

  • Seachange73

    Seachange73

    10 years ago

    Quoting 'CandyDelicious' It's interesting to see how some people really need the last word all the time. Every one twists things to suit themselves usually. Not much point arguing in circles. Is it? Quoting 'CandyDelicious' My goodness some of you have been here a long time! 2009 is 7 years ago! From your description and what a friend has told me about the old days it sounds a bit like the chat rooms. People whispering, and forming sub groups, people sleeping with each other and leaving husbands and wives for people they came to know through the chat rooms, huge vendettas and people going on massive rants. Were there ever secret chat rooms on RHP I wonder? All sounds very soap opera! Love it. :) I think we missed out on some real drama from the past. Thank God for that. I am soooo glad all those things happened before most of us. It is something I don't want to be involved with, sounds nasty. Am I being naive? No. I just don't want to be involved in other people's personality clashes. It is obvious there were some unresolved issues and pain from the experiences that those people went through. that is sad for those who were affected deeply. However, dragging it into the 'new world' where most of us are unaware or/and don't care to be involved may be too much. I just think some people just needs to move on and accept the fact that some people dont see eye to eye and forget about any vendettas. There is just so much in life to enjoy than living the past and wallowing in shit. This think keeps coming up over and over. I really don't want to hear war stories from Babylonian times! Spare us all. Just my opinion. Have a good weekend all!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    I appreciate what you're saying but I don't think they are wallowing in shit. That's a bit harsh. They're just discussing the issues that were here at the time and very much on topic. I've found the each way comments interesting and it's good to know how that made people feel, a reminder to us all that it's not always 'fair play', just my thoughts

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Interesting to watch how this topic evolved . I didn't expect past episodes to raise it's head as it has done. My post was eluding to the present whereby some people you may want to interact with on a certain topic find it quite OK not to want to reply. I read some good comments on why some don't and can appreciate you don't always get to read every post. Some found that challenging and became quite aggressive to want argue their point. ? In essence, I guess that's their right because I found myself exercising that right, right here in this topic. Not that I wanted to be rude , but because some posters directed some of their comments towards me , which I had not much knowledge of. Like the gangs of the past , so I wasn't about to become involved. My original post was talking recently and theirs in some cases up to 7 years ago. ? I was still in nappies in terms of what happened yesteryear and had no desire to talk about something I knew nothing about. But even so , some became quite aggressive and I still cant work out why. Maybe this post opened up old wounds from the past ? Whatever it was , it certainly got lively and had me wondering about the few claiming innocence, being in denial or wanting to cover up for what ever reason. ? Whatever it was, I hope this post gave everyone the chance to shake the blanket , fold it and put it behind them forever.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Yeah, I guess everyone likes the last word. Now this is my last word! 😝

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    it's only a rash

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    youve got a god damn cheek storming your way in here and upsetting the warm cosy snuggly fucking blankets. THE END :p 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌---------👺

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Quoting 'PeachyPearL' Oh yeah... and I have no idea what your post to Q means. It's not a program I watch and wondered if you'd mind dumbing it down for me. if you google "we should totally stab caesar" the first hit is a youtube clip from the Mean Girls movie it was taken from. Gretchen Weiners (whose father invented the Toaster Strudel) is giving a report to the class about Casar (IIRC) but her rather emotive response is due to equating* Regina George (who is flawless; her hair is insured for $10,000; and I heard she does car commercials.... in Japan) with Caesar. *blah, mental blanking on the proper word... "transference"?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Yes I have , and did so without even knowing I did.. ?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Quoting 'amos444' Yes I have , and did so without even knowing I did.. ? The brain scrubbing techniques seem to be right on track and while we are on the subject you do remember purchasing the gold lycra sequin encrusted slightly soiled bodysuit for $375 over the weekend? Paypals fine and just use the ID The_Grand _Illustrious_One 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌 🙌---------👺

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    A gold Lycra sequin encrusted suit . ? oh .. but I'm only mere male.? Do I really have to remove my surgeons gown to prove it ? Besides , I'm still having issues folding that fkn blanket ?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    I just searched fb and found it by typing in redhotpie forums. They even mention this thread. Is that you Amos? It looks like a social page.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Quoting 'Deep_Purple' I just searched fb and found it by typing in redhotpie forums. They even mention this thread. Is that you Amos? It looks like a social page. That's just RHP's account posting stuff up on Bookface. Hardly any conversation on that.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Quoting 'Summersolstice' Came across a RHP Forums Facebook page that was started by a couple here about two months ago. Now I'm wondering if that's the one you mean in your OP? Nice work. I didn't think to have a search myself. I doubt that it's the one talked about in this thread though. There are only 3 likes and as far as I can tell, there has only ever been 3 likes. One post by a visitor does mention the forums Deep, but I think this page is more set up towards the sexy ideas of RHP rather than gossip judging by the posts of the admin. I don't think it has anything to do with the official side of RHP Adelaide considering the group description reads, "This is a page dedicated to the RHP forums. This will be free of moderators and the RHP mafia. The purpose is to have a fun free flowing exchange of ideas". Plus it does not have the RHP banner. RHP does have several accounts, they had to start another account because the type they chose in the first place only allowed a certain amount of friends. I'd be surprised if the group referred to by Amos was public. But happy to be proven wrong, on any or all of the above. Peachy ;-)

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Quoting 'PeachyPearL' This will be free of moderators and the RHP mafia.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    I have been around the forums for a considerable amount of time. I was certainly part of a group that did tend to dominate the forums. It was not that we schemed in any way it was just we were very comfortable in how would could chat and insult each other. I was never invited to be part of an off site chat group...Perhaps I was not as cool as i thought. Here is thing when ever you have a big group of people you will always have sub groups. It is natural...Even thought I am not as active now on the forums I do not see any thing to suggest there is a group that is trying to control the forums. No one has asked me to isolate a poster. Yes I am one of the group that has IP rights and access to the chill out lounge but trust me the chill out lounge does not even go close to this sort of attitude...The lounge is a little boring actually.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    I'm the one n a million that doesn't have a Facebook profile. So no , I never seen anything from any couple . I had a Facebook profile about 3 years ago but got sick of people talking about their babies, dogs , cats , mother in laws .. Etc etc. I pulled the plug and never looked back.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    No , it wasn't me.. That's all ..

  • AnnieWhichway

    AnnieWhichway

    10 years ago

    Never ever had a facebook account. Too many judgmental types on there. Very few here.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Quoting 'amos444' I'm the one n a million that doesn't have a Facebook profile. So no , I never seen anything from any couple . I had a Facebook profile about 3 years ago but got sick of people talking about their babies, dogs , cats , mother in laws .. Etc etc. I pulled the plug and never looked back. same

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Your original post Amos,I have no idea who the couples might be but if they are exchanging opinions in private messaging about forum posters that's not villification..posting negative comments about said poster on a public forum is..Q

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    and I have no intention on exposing who they are to anyone. Doing that means I would be subjecting them to further vilification. No different to exposing any of the names mentioned in their message to me. It was said in private and mum's the word. I'm not here to vilify anyone.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    If you read my post again,I was speaking in general terms,not asking you to "out" anyone Q

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    i will mention up front that i am feeling particularly cynical and sarcastic. if you come here to find any sort of norm you are going to get brutalised. When I was a lad (pre aids) we went to pubs and everyone fucked everyone. Now the horny men in there thousands come here and the shy girls sit at home wishing. The women that put profiles up here are the adventurous ones. The ones that post here are the ones that always looked like fun at the bar. Don't take anything personal here - it will just eat you up. Fish harder and get laid. Cheers to all.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    10 years ago

    Yes amos & others who have responded the same way, it does happen a lot both on this site & another similar one & in the chat rooms. I share your frustration - one minute, you're in, the next - you could be a door post! I find it difficult though when someone as nice as I_touch_myself2 is treated the same way!!I recall at one stage I was chatting to a woman & all went quiet at the other end - I found out later she went to the shops with no mention that she was disappearing!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    This did come to make some sense in the passing of time Fair Play indeed. Peachy

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    Quoting 'Qefenta1' Your original post Amos,I have no idea who the couples might be but if they are exchanging opinions in private messaging about forum posters that's not villification..posting negative comments about said poster on a public forum is..Q I had not read much of this thread at the time, but spotted something worth mentioning for clarity: Vilification may take place either publicly or privately. Public vilification is illegal, and may be prosecuted under various Statutes. Private vilification differs only insofar as people may not be aware it has taken place, thereby making it difficult to act upon. Whether public or private, vilification as a behaviour or practice is not something to aspire to. How busy do you suppose the 'Thought Police' and the Law Courts would be if required to act on private vilification?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    Quoting 'ontology' Public vilification is illegal, and may be prosecuted under various Statutes. Which statutes? AFAIK it is only vilification of certain types, such as race, colour or ethnic origin - and also AFAIK the vilification is unlawful but not illegal. Some state's have their public websites defining vilification as illegal, under their relevant Act's it generally only becomes illegal when their is a threat made to the person/property - and it then becomes illegal rather than just unlawful.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    to be more precise and technically correct, I should have stated it may be illegal. the term 'illegal' is derived from Latin, while the term 'unlawful' is derived from old Anglo-Saxon. Both terms are frequently used interchangeably, but to be more technically correct in terms of the Legal Profession, the term 'illegal' is associated with Criminal Law, whilst the term 'unlawful' is associated with Civil Law. Reading and interpreting Law is very much a 'choose your own adventure book' in that it is highly dependent upon specific context. Choice of Legal Statute and Forum for having cases heard tends to be determined on the basis of specific details pertaining to any given case. As you point out, some of those specific details may tip the balance toward Criminal rather than Civil Law. In any event, whatever the specifics of a case involving vilification (if actually brought to account), there are sanctions. Everything comes at a cost, eh.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    We cross s'words' again. Without looking back, I'm pretty sure it was you who drew my attention to that 'public' page on this thread way back in May... which is not at all what I am referring to in my last posts. And, comments of yours on this thread rang bells at the time but only came to make sense months later. That you had a private profile of your own that is probably the basis of this thread. I digress... Aside from admiring the gumption of the Admin to have a 'public' page ... 'I didn't 'like' all or even many of the posts on that page but I did 'like' the one's I agreed with. One was that the 'hung' thread was going better now that people were posting on topic rather than being spiteful etc. LOVED that! Oh yeah and there was the mention of the positivity of I touch's touch. Peachy, touched

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    I don't use face ache so what I don't know can't hurt me. FTW.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    I had an epiphany on Q's word thread the other day. But I spelt it out. I have multiple profiles on fb but only use 1 as an active profile because It is all me and I'm happy to have my public posts under my persona. I even follow redhotpie on RHP, I don't have much to hide. My other profiles are used for playing fb games you need neighbours/friends for. I don't like to harass my friends with requests multiple times a day. Interesting differences. I love your photos. You seem like a wonderful person in your life with your love and caring for pets, children and patients. And of course your friends. I'm not as bad as you seem to think. Peachy :-)

  • RHP

    RHP User

    9 years ago

    I am not cautious enough about connections between my predilections and the children on my facebook profile at times though and that became obvious to me yesterday. Moments of horror seeing a like from a youngster I know should not be seeing the fb page and sexual details on there. Screech in total reverse and never ashamed to swallow my words. Peachy

Page 2 of 2 1 2